Re: [netlmm] [netext] [MEXT] NEXTEXT2: first draft of the bof description

[Rajeev Koodli <rajeev.koodli at gmail.com>]

Raj,


>> c)  that you want network layer software in the  mobile but not MIP;
>> (This clearly makes no sense given your "why")
>
> Again, I don't think I said that what I said equates to creating new network
> layer software in the host other than MIP. If the conclusion of the
> discussion results in the understanding that to accomplish these features
> the only option is to develop network layer protocols/software, then I think
> it would be logical to say "Use MIP". But I don't know if we are there yet.
> At least there is a view that there are things other than developing new
> network layer protocols/SW to achieve this functionality.

Are you saying that if we do develop an extension in L3, that would
equate to MIP?

You could have a functionality in L3 independent of the actual
mobility model, no?

-Rajeev






>
>>
>> Would you rather revise your "why" ? :-)
>
> Not yet... But I am keeping an open mind :)
>
> -Raj
>
>>
>> George
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netext mailing list
> netext at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netext
>