Just a quick question about the following scenario:
Lets say a (DS)MIP6 capable MN is attached via a PMIP6 domain thru a MAG. The MN is assigned a prefix from the LMA/HA.
To the MN it appears as if it is on its home link.
The MN moves and attaches to its physical home link.
The MN does not see any difference in terms of the home link (virtual or physical) and hence does not initiate any deregistration procedures.
However the MN is unable to use the HoA/HNP until the binding in the LMA is deprecated.
The MAG may eventually discover that the MN is no longer attached and send a dereg. However that detection may be delayed significantly.
Is the above scenario and issue discussed in the netlmm-mip interactions I-D? At least I could not notice it.
-Raj