Re: [netmod] use cases was: finish up

[Phil Shafer <phil at juniper.net>]

"Randy Presuhn" writes:
>I'm not arguing that we need to do the s-c at this time.
>Rather, I'm arguing that if we do do s-c at this time,
>the MUST approach is much more tractable than the MAY
>approach.  The MAY approach may have its legitimate uses,
>but doing it right means (at least to me) going through
>the exercise of figuring out the limits of conditionally
>mandatory elements in models, which in your example goes
>far beyond what can reasonably be expressed today.

My concerns are more practical.  MUST forces a modeler to do something
that might not be required, and the real difference (in terms of
behaviors) in MUST and MAY is near zero.  The client will refetch
either way (if it cares).  The server will be driven by the behavior
required in the "description", not the "s-c" statement.

Thanks,
 Phil