Re: [netmod] operational knobs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [netmod] operational knobs



That would indeed seem an appropriate place to deal with the topic.
Joel

Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: netmod-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:netmod-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Andy Bierman
Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2009 11:57 PM
To: Joel M. Halpern
Cc: NETMOD Working Group
Subject: Re: [netmod] operational knobs

Joel M. Halpern wrote:
While I do not know what the right answer is for YANG,
let's not get
too distracted by the SNMP answer. The mechanism used for
this sort
of thing by SNMP is a kludge designed to work around the limitaiton where the only operations were get and set.

Agreed -- but I view the IETF SNMP experience as more than a distraction. We are theoretically asking IETF WGs to stop using SMIv2 and start using YANG to design data models. I think the differences, and guidelines wrt/ those differences, are relevant to a significant portion of the IETF community.


I agree. Is not this something that netmod-arch should deal with?
Dan


Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.