Re: [netmod] operational knobs

["Joel M. Halpern" <jmh at joelhalpern.com>]

To be specific, it was to "not add them now."
I believe Andy said that he does not want to add them before YANG 1.0.

His point, which I think is well taken, is that we will need to figure 
out what variation on action / rpc definition we want to use, and define 
it.  Text pointing in the right direction should go somewhere (the arch 
draft seems sensible) so that folks do not simply re-implement the SNMP 
mechanism.

Also note, the question you pointed to was actually much narrower, as it 
was about defining actions in lists, which introduces many powerful and 
complicated issues.

Yours,
Joel

Phil Shafer wrote:
> Andy Bierman writes:
> > The consensus seems to be that 'action' (rpc-stmt) is
> > the correct choice, not a config=true leaf.
>
> "actions" were already discussed and the concensus was not to add them:
>
>   http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/netmod/trac/wiki/Issues_yang#issue-00221
>
> Thanks,
>  Phil
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod