newtrk Discussion Archive - Date Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Thread Index]
[IETF Main Archive Directory]
- Aug 03 2005
- RE: [newtrk] In support of Larry's proposal, Larry Masinter
- RE: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, john.loughney
- Re: [newtrk] In support of Larry's proposal, Sam Hartman
- Re: [newtrk] IESG and 2026 review, Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] IESG and 2026 review, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] In support of Larry's proposal, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] thoughts from the newtrk WG chair, Douglas Otis
- Re: [newtrk] In support of Larry's proposal, Sam Hartman
- [newtrk] IESG and 2026 review, Sam Hartman
- Re: [newtrk] In support of Larry's proposal, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] thoughts from the newtrk WG chair, John C Klensin
- [newtrk] My opinion of ISDs, Sam Hartman
- Re: [newtrk] thoughts from the newtrk WG chair, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] thoughts from the newtrk WG chair, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, Brian E Carpenter
- [newtrk] In support of Larry's proposal, Sam Hartman
- Aug 02 2005
- Aug 01 2005
- Re: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, Spencer Dawkins
- RE: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, john.loughney
- Re: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, Pekka Savola
- RE: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, john.loughney
- Re: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, Spencer Dawkins
- RE: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, Pekka Savola
- RE: [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, john.loughney
- [newtrk] one size fits all vs two-step, Pekka Savola
- Jul 28 2005
- Jul 26 2005
- Re: SRDs vs ISDs [Re: [newtrk] Re: implementation / interoperability reports vs. ISDs], Douglas Otis
- Re: SRDs vs ISDs [Re: [newtrk] Re: implementation / interoperability reports vs. ISDs], Bruce Lilly
- Re: SRDs vs ISDs [Re: [newtrk] Re: implementation / interoperability reports vs. ISDs], Douglas Otis
- Re: SRDs vs ISDs [Re: [newtrk] Re: implementation / interoperability reports vs. ISDs], Bruce Lilly
- Re: SRDs vs ISDs [Re: [newtrk] Re: implementation / interoperability reports vs. ISDs], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: SRDs vs ISDs [Re: [newtrk] Re: implementation / interoperability reports vs. ISDs], Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt, Eliot Lear
- SRDs vs ISDs [Re: [newtrk] Re: implementation / interoperability reports vs. ISDs], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] Moving forward from draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt, Brian E Carpenter
- [newtrk] Re: I-D ACTION:draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt, Brian E Carpenter
- Jul 25 2005
- Jul 24 2005
- Jul 23 2005
- Jul 22 2005
- Re: [newtrk] Moving forward from draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt, Douglas Otis
- Re: [newtrk] Moving forward from draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] Moving forward from draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt, Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] Moving forward from draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt, Eliot Lear
- Re: [newtrk] Moving forward from draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt, Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] Moving forward from draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt, John Leslie
- Re: [newtrk] Moving forward from draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt, Eliot Lear
- Re: [newtrk] Moving forward from draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt, Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] Moving forward from draft-lear-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] implementation / interoperability reports vs. ISDs, Douglas Otis
- Jul 21 2005
- Jul 19 2005
- Jul 19 2005
- Jul 18 2005
- Jul 15 2005
- Jul 15 2005
- Jul 14 2005
- Jul 13 2005
- Jul 12 2005
- Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, C. M. Heard
- [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Jeffrey Hutzelman
- Re: [newtrk] web-based lists of RFCs, Michael Richardson
- RE: [newtrk] web-based lists of RFCs, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Spencer Dawkins
- RE: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Larry Masinter
- RE: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, john.loughney
- [newtrk] RE: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, john.loughney
- RE: [newtrk] web-based lists of RFCs, john.loughney
- [newtrk] RE: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, john.loughney
- RE: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, john.loughney
- RE: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, john.loughney
- [newtrk] RE: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, john.loughney
- Jul 11 2005
- [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [newtrk] web-based lists of RFCs, Brian E Carpenter
- [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Bob Braden
- Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Brian E Carpenter
- [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Ted Hardie
- [newtrk] RE: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Spencer Dawkins
- [newtrk] RE: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, john.loughney
- [newtrk] RE: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, john.loughney
- [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Eliot Lear
- [newtrk] Re: Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, Iljitsch van Beijnum
- [newtrk] Question about Obsoleted vs. Historic, john.loughney
- Jul 07 2005
- Jul 06 2005
- Jul 05 2005
- Jul 04 2005
- Jun 29 2005
- Jun 28 2005
- Jun 26 2005
- Jun 25 2005
- Jun 23 2005
- Jun 22 2005
- Jun 17 2005
- Jun 16 2005
- Jun 15 2005
- Jun 14 2005
- ISDs, profiles and doing other SDOs' work (Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions), Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, mcr
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Lakshminath Dondeti
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Dave Crocker
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, mcr
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Lakshminath Dondeti
- [newtrk] ISDs and host requirements, mcr
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Dave Crocker
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, mcr
- [newtrk] "ISD" -- more like a 'working group charter', Larry Masinter
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Dave Crocker
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Dave Crocker
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-newtrk-twostep-00.txt], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Dave Crocker
- RE: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [newtrk] first two meta questions, Joel M. Halpern
- Jun 13 2005
- Jun 10 2005
- Jun 09 2005
- Re: [newtrk] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-newtrk-twostep-00.txt], Dave Crocker
- Re: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, Dave Crocker
- Re: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, Joe Touch
- Re: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, John C Klensin
- RE: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
- Re: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, Spencer Dawkins
- [newtrk] Rough outline of evolutionary approach., Douglas Otis
- Jun 08 2005
- Jun 07 2005
- Jun 06 2005
- Re: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, mcr
- Re: [newtrk] newtrk not following its charter, mcr
- Re: [newtrk] newtrk not following its charter, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [newtrk] newtrk not following its charter, John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] newtrk not following its charter, Douglas Otis
- Re: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [newtrk] newtrk not following its charter, John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] newtrk not following its charter, John Leslie
- Re: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, Margaret Wasserman
- Re: [newtrk] newtrk not following its charter, John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] pepost - IESG comments on ISDs, mcr
- [newtrk] newtrk not following its charter, Scott Bradner
- Re: [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, John C Klensin
- [newtrk] pepost - IESG comments on ISDs, Scott Bradner
- Re: [newtrk] [Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-carpenter-newtrk-twostep-00.txt], Brian E Carpenter
- [newtrk] starting a focused discussion, Scott Bradner
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Spencer Dawkins
- Jun 05 2005
- Jun 03 2005
- Jun 02 2005
- Jun 01 2005
- May 17 2005
- May 17 2005
- May 16 2005
- May 14 2005
- May 14 2005
- May 13 2005
- May 12 2005
- Re: [newtrk] The anomalous state STD10 is OBSOLETED, Bruce Lilly
- [newtrk] The anomalous state STD10 is OBSOLETED, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Bruce Lilly
- RE: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Bruce Lilly
- RE: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Brian E Carpenter
- May 11 2005
- May 10 2005
- RE: [newtrk] Re:, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [newtrk] Re:, Bruce Lilly
- RE: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Spencer Dawkins
- [newtrk] Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 13:16:08 -0700, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Joe Touch
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Sam Hartman
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Pekka Savola
- RE: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Sam Hartman
- Re: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Douglas Otis
- Re: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Joe Touch
- RE: [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [newtrk] Erata in ISDs problematic, Sam Hartman
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Sam Hartman
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Pekka Savola
- [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal, Brian E Carpenter
- Apr 22 2005
- Apr 19 2005
- Apr 14 2005
- Apr 12 2005
- Apr 11 2005
- Apr 05 2005
- Apr 04 2005
- Apr 03 2005
- Mar 23 2005
- Mar 22 2005
- Mar 21 2005
- Mar 20 2005
- Mar 18 2005
- Mar 16 2005
- Mar 15 2005
- Mar 14 2005
- Mar 10 2005
- Mar 04 2005
- Feb 10 2005
- Feb 10 2005
- Feb 08 2005
- Feb 07 2005
- Dec 21 2004
- Dec 20 2004
- Dec 19 2004
- Dec 18 2004
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Bob Braden
- [newtrk] Re: Historic (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), Bob Braden
- [newtrk] Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), William Allen Simpson
- Re: [newtrk] Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), John C Klensin
- [newtrk] Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- RE: [newtrk] Maybe a next step outside NEWTRK, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [newtrk] Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), Keith Moore
- Re: [newtrk] Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be, Scott Bradner
- RE: [newtrk] Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [newtrk] Maybe a next step outside NEWTRK, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [newtrk] Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), Eliot Lear
- Re: [newtrk] Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), Scott W Brim
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Keith Moore
- Re: [newtrk] Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), Keith Moore
- Dec 17 2004
- RE: [newtrk] Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [newtrk] Re: Historic (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), William Allen Simpson
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Robert Moskowitz
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, William Allen Simpson
- [newtrk] Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), William Allen Simpson
- [newtrk] Re: Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, William Allen Simpson
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, William Allen Simpson
- Process issue (was Re: [newtrk] Genuine public comment [Re: List of Old Standards to be retired]), Alistair . Urie
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, John C Klensin
- RE: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [newtrk] Historic (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Eric Rosen
- RE: [newtrk] What we have learned so far about retiring standards, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- [newtrk] Why old-standards (Re: List of Old Standards to be retired), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Higher level NEWTRK argument (Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards) retired, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Carsten Bormann
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] Genuine public comment [Re: List of Old Standards to be retired], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] Genuine public comment [Re: List of Old Standards to be retired], Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Eliot Lear
- Re: [Old-standards] Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] What we have learned so far about retiring standards, Keith Moore
- RE: [newtrk] What we have learned so far about retiring standards, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Bill Fenner
- [newtrk] What we have learned so far about retiring standards, Paul Hoffman / VPNC
- Dec 16 2004
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, stanislav shalunov
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, John C Klensin
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Bill Fenner
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Eric Rosen
- [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, William Allen Simpson
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Eliot Lear
- [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Vijay Devarapalli
- [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Eric Rosen
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Carsten Bormann
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Bob Braden
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Bob Braden
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, George Swallow
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Bob Braden
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: [newtrk] Re: [Old-standards] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Scott W Brim
- [newtrk] Re: [Old-standards] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Carsten Bormann
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Carsten Bormann
- [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Alexey Melnikov
- [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Carsten Bormann
- Re: [newtrk] Genuine public comment [Re: List of Old Standards to be retired], Alistair . Urie
- [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Eliot Lear
- Re: [newtrk] Genuine public comment [Re: List of Old Standards to be retired], Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] Genuine public comment [Re: List of Old Standards to be retired], Keith Moore
- RE: [newtrk] Genuine public comment [Re: List of Old Standards to be retired], Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [newtrk] Re: [Old-standards] Re: List of Old Standards to be ..., Scott Bradner
- [newtrk] Genuine public comment [Re: List of Old Standards to be retired], Brian E Carpenter
- [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] Re: [Old-standards] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Margaret Wasserman
- [newtrk] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, James M. Polk
- [newtrk] Re: [Old-standards] Re: List of Old Standards to be retired, Spencer Dawkins
- [newtrk] List of Old Standards to be retired, Eliot Lear
- Re: [newtrk] newtrk milestone done?, Spencer Dawkins
- Dec 15 2004
- Dec 06 2004
- Dec 03 2004
- Nov 30 2004
- Nov 30 2004
- Nov 24 2004
- Nov 24 2004
- Nov 23 2004
- Nov 21 2004
- Nov 19 2004
- Nov 18 2004
- RE: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- Experimental Protocols as core documents (outstanding), john.loughney
- Re: [newtrk] cruft & UPDATES, UPDATED-BY, Pekka Savola
- [newtrk] cruft & UPDATES, UPDATED-BY, Aaron Falk
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- Experimental Protocols as core documents (outstanding), Joe Touch
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs, Joe Touch
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- part 2 - probable agreement, Joe Touch
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- Experimental Protocols a s core documents (outstanding), Joe Touch
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- BCPs as core documents (outstanding), Joe Touch
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- Experimental Protocols a s core documents (outstanding), Joe Touch
- Nov 17 2004
- Nov 16 2004
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- Experimental Protocols a s core documents (outstanding), Tony Hansen
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- Experimental Protocols as core documents (outstanding), Joel M. Halpern
- RE: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- Experimental Protocols a s core documents (outstanding), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- Experimental Protocols a s core documents (outstanding), Spencer Dawkins
- RE: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- Experimental Protocols a s core documents (outstanding), john.loughney
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- Experimental Protocols a s core documents (outstanding), Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- part 2 - probable agreement, Spencer Dawkins
- RE: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- part 1 - apparent agreem ent, Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- part 1 - apparent agreement, Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- part 1 - apparent agreement, Alistair . Urie
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- BCPs as core documents (outstanding), Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- part 1 - apparent agreement, Pekka Savola
- RE: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- part 2 - probable agreem ent, Lars-Erik Jonsson (LU/EAB)
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- Experimental Protocols a s core documents (outstanding), Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] Meeting discussion of ISDs- part 2 - probable agreement, Brian E Carpenter
Mail converted by MHonArc