Re: [newtrk] Reviewing state of PS and DS standards

["C. M. Heard" <heard at pobox.com>]

On Sun, 13 Aug 2006, Eliot Lear wrote:
> [ ... ] I once again urge the IESG to recognize that RFC 2026
> needs fixing.  We need to evolve as an organization.  It does
> not bode well that our processes have ossified so much in the
> face of a huge amount of evidence that they need fixing.

Previously, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> I [ ... ] do not believe there were any signs of newtrk reaching
> a consensus [on] what to do about those phenonema.

Despite some suggestions to the contrary, I would have to say that
I agree with Brian's assessment.  Maybe one way forward would be
for the IESG to recharter newtrk with the specific mandate of
simply documenting what we actually practice.

//cmh

.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html