RE: [newtrk] IETF Process discussions - next steps

["Robert Snively" <rsnively at Brocade.COM>]

Still got the problems.

Haven't got the solutions.

What other forum would you suggest to approach the
problems?

Bob

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-newtrk at lists.uoregon.edu
[mailto:owner-newtrk at lists.uoregon.edu] On Behalf Of Brian E Carpenter
Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 6:01 AM
To: New Track
Subject: Re: [newtrk] IETF Process discussions - next steps

There's been some good discussion but nothing that changes my
opinion that closing this WG is the right thing to do, for
the reasons I gave, above all the lack of a broad consensus
for any specific major change.

The discussion can certainly continue, and I will ask for this
list to be retained if possible, at least for a while.

I would like to thank Scott Bradner for his willingness to
chair this WG, even when things got tricky or frustrating.
Also thanks go to everyone who contributed drafts or ideas.

    Brian Carpenter
    General Area Director
.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html


.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html