[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [nfsv4] re: ACL and Posix Mode bit interaction

To: wurzl_mario at emc.com
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] re: ACL and Posix Mode bit interaction
From: Jim Rees <rees at umich.edu>
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 13:21:45 -0400
Cc: nfsv4 at ietf.org, rick at snowhite.cis.uoguelph.ca
In-reply-to: <75852864BAD9684FBF5DCF4289DE4076014CD1B5@CORPUSMX30B.corp.emc.com> (wurzl_mario@emc.com, Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:57:50 EDT)
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/nfsv4>
List-help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>

  I believe you mean "no ACL" use the mode-bits.

Rick seems to think there is no such thing as "no acl."  I'm not convinced:

   The server must return an error
   if it supports an attribute but cannot obtain its value.  In that
   case no attribute values will be returned.

But I'll defer to Rick on this.

_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list
nfsv4 at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

References:
- RE: [nfsv4] re: ACL and Posix Mode bit interaction
  - From: wurzl_mario

Prev by Date: RE: [nfsv4] Files without ACLs?
Next by Date: Re: [nfsv4] re: ACL and Posix Mode bit interaction
Previous by thread: RE: [nfsv4] re: ACL and Posix Mode bit interaction
Next by thread: Re: [nfsv4] re: ACL and Posix Mode bit interaction
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread