[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [NGO] What work should we charter next?

To: schishol at nortel.com
Subject: Re: [NGO] What work should we charter next?
From: Martin Bjorklund <mbj at tail-f.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:26:23 +0100 (CET)
Cc: ngo at ietf.org
In-reply-to: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B40CE219DD@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>
List-archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ngo>
List-help: <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: NETCONF Goes On - discussions on future work and extensions to NETCONF <ngo.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:ngo@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo>, <mailto:ngo-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <713043CE8B8E1348AF3C546DBE02C1B40CE219DD@zcarhxm2.corp.nortel.com>

"Sharon Chisholm" <schishol at nortel.com> wrote:
> 3. Channelized SSH 

Is anything needed for this?  The channel mechanism is of course built
into SSH, and there's nothing in rfc4742 that talks about limiting
the number of channels to one.

I also suspect that most implementations will handle this by default.


/martin


_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo

References:
- [NGO] What work should we charter next?
  - From: Sharon Chisholm

Prev by Date: RE: [NGO] What work should we charter next?
Next by Date: Re: [NGO] What work should we charter next?
Previous by thread: RE: [NGO] What work should we charter next?
Next by thread: Re: [NGO] What work should we charter next?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread