Re: [NGO] external module properties

[Martin Bjorklund <mbj at tail-f.com>]

Hi,

While I agree with Juergen about the general idea that YANG should not
try to enforce arbitrary rules on the user, in the case of 'revision'
I think it falls into the same category as 'namespace' and 'prefix'.
Neither is strictly speaking not required in all cases - a namespace
is not needed if the module is a type library such as yang-types; a
prefix is not needed if there are no local references in the module.

And I also agree that the revision might be needed for proper schema
discovery.

I think I'd rather see all three mandatory than all three optional.


/martin
_______________________________________________
NGO mailing list
NGO at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ngo