[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [NSIS] QSPEC document
Hi,
To be clear, I think it is problematic that the editors of one the WG
documents says that the latest round of changes in another WG document
has swept away parts of the foundation which they have built on. I
definitely don't like to see such thing happen. Thus I request that you
improve the communication between each other. Editors you are not
working in a vacuum, you have other WG drafts with relations to the one
you are working on. That must be considered when doing changes.
john.loughney at nokia.com skrev:
I judge that there has been consensus on this issue, and I have judged
that there is rough consensus from the working group on the current
editing of the QSPEC document.
Well, I would recommend that you take one step back here. There is
evident that there is a lot of confusion on what the consensus was. It
seems that in another part of this thread there at least has been some
identification of some part of the issue.
So please everyone. Be clearer in the communication what you mean.
Please write what you think are overly clear statements. It will at
least help this AD to keep track of what you actually mean.
The WG needs to work these issues out, and soon.
Cheers
Magnus Westerlund
IETF Transport Area Director & TSVWG Chair
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Multimedia Technologies, Ericsson Research EAB/TVA/A
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ericsson AB | Phone +46 8 4048287
Torshamsgatan 23 | Fax +46 8 7575550
S-164 80 Stockholm, Sweden | mailto: magnus.westerlund at ericsson.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
nsis mailing list
nsis at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis