[NSIS] Admission field in QSPECRE: Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt
<john.loughney@nokia.com> Mon, 25 February 2008 20:41 UTC
Return-Path: <nsis-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: ietfarch-nsis-archive@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ietfarch-nsis-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E3928C8E1; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:41:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.157
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.157 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, FH_RELAY_NODNS=1.451, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HTML_MESSAGE=1, J_CHICKENPOX_14=0.6, RDNS_NONE=0.1, SARE_SUB_OBFU_Q1=0.227]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tiiDK5aYy1Vf; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:41:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from core3.amsl.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A092228C8D3; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:10:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nsis@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9007028CFFC for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:10:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xYZwrOYtipMu for <nsis@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:10:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mgw-mx09.nokia.com (smtp.nokia.com [192.100.105.134]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241EB3A6CEA for <nsis@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:02:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com (esebh108.ntc.nokia.com [172.21.143.145]) by mgw-mx09.nokia.com (Switch-3.2.6/Switch-3.2.6) with ESMTP id m1PK3FPi005409; Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:03:23 -0600
Received: from daebh101.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.35.111]) by esebh108.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 22:01:46 +0200
Received: from daebe104.NOE.Nokia.com ([10.241.36.13]) by daebh101.NOE.Nokia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:01:42 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 14:01:38 -0600
Message-ID: <19EBBEC503C3B5469070E0A6674A533A010C40F3@daebe104.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <17811FF8-52E1-48AC-9966-3B96798C1A0A@g11.org.uk>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Admission field in QSPECRE: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt
Thread-Index: Ach358ufvM5U/dwVRoCN+JlD5iiboQAAIGCg
References: <17811FF8-52E1-48AC-9966-3B96798C1A0A@g11.org.uk>
From: john.loughney@nokia.com
To: carlberg@g11.org.uk, gash5107@yahoo.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 25 Feb 2008 20:01:42.0836 (UTC) FILETIME=[3DD2A740:01C877E9]
X-Nokia-AV: Clean
Cc: nsis@ietf.org
Subject: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPECRE: Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt
X-BeenThere: nsis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Next Steps in Signaling <nsis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:nsis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis>, <mailto:nsis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1152907177=="
Sender: nsis-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: nsis-bounces@ietf.org
Hi all, Just some background history. There are 3 documents defining similar fields tsvwg-emergency-rsvp nsis-qspec dime-qos-parameters We discussed this on this list and at previous IETF meetings. My view of consensus was that there should be some harmony and a common registry between these documents. I think wee need to be able to support a few different scenarios and usages for the admission priority. Is there a way that we could have a common structure to hold the values, and the ability to set the values accordingly? John ________________________________ From: ext ken carlberg [mailto:carlberg@g11.org.uk] Sent: 25 February, 2008 11:50 To: gash5107@yahoo.com Cc: nsis ((E-mail)); tarapore@att.com; Francois Le Faucheur IMAP; Loughney John (Nokia-OCTO/PaloAlto) Subject: Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Jerry, > Right, there is no issue in having an IETF spec tied to an ITU spec. If ITU modifies their > spec, IANA will make the corresponding changes in the IETF IANA assignments. E.g., if > ITU later standardizes more priority levels, say in "Y.2171.bis', IANA will change the > admission priority registry accordingly. I checked that out with IANA a while ago, IANA can > tie into ITU specs in this way. if the Admission field in the QSPEC is to be so entwined with Y.1541 values (and possibly Y.2171.bis), then perhaps the Admission field in QSPEC should be renamed as ITU-Admission? Or possibly one could define a new field called ITU-admission that supports the Y.1541 pre-defined values. It would also seem helpful to add another related field that indicates which Y.xxxx standard is being used since there may be some domains that only support Y.1541, others supporting Y.2171.bis, and whatever future iteration is defined by the ITU. I assume folks are not relying on a flag day change in support of new updates generated by the ITU? and as far as the current values set by Y.1541, I wish there was support for Scavenger Service, which is considered less than Best Effort (already defined as "0" in Y.1541). Since I'm not a member of the ITU, I can't advocate this position nor accomplish it if the Admission field of all three drafts <emergency-rsvp>, <dime-qos-parameters> and <nsis-qspec> are subject to values defined by the ITU. and please note, I'm not saying that a field cannot reflect efforts put forth by the ITU, but rather if the need must exist, then I'd prefer that the QSPEC authors rename or create a new field for Y.1541 or Y.2171.bis regards, -ken
_______________________________________________ nsis mailing list nsis@ietf.org http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
- [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Gerald Ash
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt David R Oran
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt john.loughney
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Gerald Ash
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Gerald Ash
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt TARAPORE, PERCY S, ATTLABS
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt TARAPORE, PERCY S, ATTLABS
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Gerald Ash
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Gerald Ash
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt ken carlberg
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPECRE: Review of … ken carlberg
- [NSIS] Admission field in QSPECRE: Review of draf… john.loughney
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Gerald Ash
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPECRE: Review of … TARAPORE, PERCY S, ATTLABS
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt ken carlberg
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt Gerald Ash
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPECRE: Review of … Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPECRE: Review of … Francois Le Faucheur IMAP
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt TARAPORE, PERCY S, ATTLABS
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… Gerald Ash
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt ken carlberg
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… ken carlberg
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… Magnus Westerlund
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… Roy, Radhika R Dr CTR USA USAMC
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… Gerald Ash
- Re: [NSIS] Review of draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-18.txt TARAPORE, PERCY S, ATTLABS
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… Roy, Radhika R Dr CTR USA USAMC
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… ken carlberg
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… Gerald Ash
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… ken carlberg
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… James M. Polk
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… Gerald Ash
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… James M. Polk
- Re: [NSIS] Admission field in QSPEC -- was RE: Re… Gerald Ash