Re: [NSIS] WGLC for Using and Extending the NSIS Protocol Family (draft-ietf-nsis-ext-02)

[Elwyn Davies <elwynd at dial.pipex.com>]

Hi.

I have just submitted a new version of the extensibility draft which I
hope addresses all these comments, and has also been resynched with the
RAO story as per mtlp version 20.

Thanks for the helpful review.

Not sure if this will need another WGLC due to RAO changes.

Regards,
Elwyn

Magnus Westerlund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have reviewed the document and have some comments.
>
> 1. First of all I wonder if all the WG history really need to be in this
> document. I don't see a purpose for it in most cases.
>
> 2. The introduction could be more explicit about the purpose of this
> document.
>
> 3. I think the topic of RAO could be a bit more clear about the issues
> with deploying it, due to adminstrative filtering at domain borders etc.
> Also the suggestions that RAO might be used, should probably
> informatively reference the draft for RAO with NSIS. In addition be
> clear on that this is likely only for limited deployements.
>
> 4. Section 6.1. Are you really certain that there will be need for
> hardware replacement to implement GIST with UDP port filtering to
> capture query packets. It seems that on a number of platforms this is
> likely not needed. So I think a balanced view here that it might, or
> might not be needed depending on the actual hardware in place is the
> right message.
>
> 5. I think especially section 8 could use some work on the layout. The
> text is very dense. I do understand why bullets are used, but I think
> forcing some line breaks between them could make it more readable.
>
> Cheers
>
> Magnus
>
> Martin Stiemerling skrev:
>   
>> Dear all,
>>
>> The draft draft-ietf-nsis-ext-02 seems to be ready for WGLC.
>>
>> We start a WGLC today for two weeks, i.e., until April 17, 2009.
>>
>> Please read the draft and send your comments about it.
>>
>> Comments includes, but are not limited to (just as a reminder):
>> - what's wrong
>> - what's right
>> - stating that the draft ready for sending it to the IESG
>> - stating that the draft is not ready for sending it to the IESG and why it is not.
>>
>>   Martin
>>
>> stiemerling at nw.neclab.eu
>>
>> NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division
>> NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014 
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> nsis mailing list
>> nsis at ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nsis
>>
>>     
>
>
>