Re: [NSIS] draft-ietf-nsis-qspec and emergency-rsvp

[Janet P Gunn <jgunn6 at csc.com>]

I take it back. 

 My mind must be going.  I
was confusing the NSIS documents with the DIME documents.

My deepest apologies for causing confusion.

Janet

This is a PRIVATE message. If you are not the intended recipient, please
delete without copying and kindly advise us by e-mail of the mistake in
delivery. 
NOTE: Regardless of content, this e-mail shall not operate to bind CSC
to any order or other contract unless pursuant to explicit written agreement
or government initiative expressly permitting the use of e-mail for such
purpose.

Francois Le Faucheur <flefauch at cisco.com>

10/14/2009 04:56 AM

To	"(IJ/ETH) Attila Báder" <Attila.Bader at ericsson.com>, g.karagiannis at ewi.utwente.nl, Lars Eggert <lars.eggert at nokia.com>, cornelia.kappler at googlemail.com, David R Oran <oran at cisco.com>
cc	Le Faucheur Francois <flefauch at cisco.com>, "Carlberg, Kenneth G." <KENNETH.G.CARLBERG at saic.com>, "James M. Polk" <jmpolk at cisco.com>, Gorry Fairhurst <gorry at erg.abdn.ac.uk>, NSIS <nsis at ietf.org>, Janet P Gunn/USA/CSC at CSC
Subject	draft-ietf-nsis-qspec and emergency-rsvp

Folks,

draft-ietf-nsis-qspec-21 (now expired) specifies the <Admission  
Priority> and <RPH Priority>. It also refers to emergency-rsvp
in  
several places (e.g. in IANA section for extended RPH registry).

Janet indicated that changes may be in the works in regards to those.  
Could you update us on the NSIS qspec plans wrt to:
                
* <Admission Priority>
                
* <RPH Priority>
                
* references to emergency-rsvp
?

This is so we ensure we have appropriate references back from  
emergency-rsvp to nsis-qspec.

Thank you

Francois