[OAUTH-WG] Draft Using OAuth for Recursive Delegation
"Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)" <zeltsan@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 04 September 2009 20:18 UTC
Return-Path: <zeltsan@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFEF3A6A8B for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:18:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.665
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.665 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.967, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_43=0.6, MANGLED_LIST=2.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZiN0tW9ZMDhU for <oauth@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail4.lucent.com (ihemail4.lucent.com [135.245.0.39]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F993A6765 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 13:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihrh1.emsr.lucent.com (h135-1-218-53.lucent.com [135.1.218.53]) by ihemail4.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id n84KJ1x5024377 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:19:01 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from USNAVSXCHHUB01.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com (usnavsxchhub01.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com [135.3.39.110]) by ihrh1.emsr.lucent.com (8.13.8/emsr) with ESMTP id n84KIxm8015291; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:18:59 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from USNAVSXCHMBSA3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.127]) by USNAVSXCHHUB01.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.3.39.110]) with mapi; Fri, 4 Sep 2009 15:18:59 -0500
From: "Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)" <zeltsan@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 15:18:58 -0500
Thread-Topic: Draft Using OAuth for Recursive Delegation
Thread-Index: AcotnB5FBELrD/UWRvKoZxVZyx/k1w==
Message-ID: <5710F82C0E73B04FA559560098BF95B124EDC376C6@USNAVSXCHMBSA3.ndc.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_5710F82C0E73B04FA559560098BF95B124EDC376C6USNAVSXCHMBSA_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.39
Cc: "Vrancken, Bart Bv (Bart)" <bart.bv.vrancken@alcatel-lucent.be>
Subject: [OAUTH-WG] Draft Using OAuth for Recursive Delegation
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:18:45 -0000
Following up on the discussion on the subject known as "four-legged" authorization, we have prepared a draft describing a use case for re-delegation of authorization. I have just submitted the draft to the IETF (it is also attached). Your comments are welcome. Zachary Zeltsan
- [OAUTH-WG] Draft Using OAuth for Recursive Delega… Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)