Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposal for a New 2617 Scheme: Token

[Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran at hueniverse.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Kemp [mailto:john at jkemp.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2009 6:15 PM

> On Oct 6, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote:
> 
> > How do people feel about defining two (syntactically identical)
> 
> What do you mean "syntactically identical"?

Everything the same (signature flow, parameters, etc.) but use username in one and token for another where credentials are expected (same with secret and password).
 
> > schemes: Delegated and Direct.
> 
> I like this idea.
> 
> >
> > Both will use the same method(s) of making authenticated requests
> 
> As in the same set of signing mechanisms can be used in either case?

Yes.

EHL