[OAUTH-WG] SAML Assertion Flow (was: Draft progress update)

Instead of "SAML Assertion Flow" maybe we should stick with the more
generic "Assertion Flow".

The assertion_format parameter allows you to define the assertion
type. Maybe we can predefine
some well know formats, for example: "saml1", "saml1.1" and "saml2"?

Marius

On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 6:22 PM, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com> wrote:
> I'm making good progress working off David's draft and bringing text from
> WRAP into it, as well as from OAuth 1.0a, and my token auth proposal. So far
> it is largely in line with David's proposal and the majority of changes are
> purely editorial.
>
> The only significant change I have made (which is of course open to debate)
> is renaming all the authorization flows parameters. I dropped the oauth_
> prefix (no real need since these are purely OAuth endpoints, not protected
> resources), and made most of the parameter names shorter. I am not done so
> they are not consistent yet.
>
> You can follow my progress (changes every few hours) at:
>
> http://github.com/theRazorBlade/draft-ietf-oauth/raw/master/draft-ietf-oauth
> .txt
>
> Please feel free to comment on anything you like or dislike. I will publish
> the whole thing as an I-D once it is feature complete for the WG to discuss
> before we promote this to a WG draft.
>
> I hope to be done with the initial draft by middle of next week (I'll be
> flying most of Fri-Sat so no progress over the weekend).
>
> EHL
>
> _______________________________________________
> OAuth mailing list
> OAuth@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth
>