Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer Shepherd Write-up

Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com> Tue, 06 May 2014 22:40 UTC

Return-Path: <sakimura@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: oauth@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754211A0660 for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 May 2014 15:40:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_RED=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gBnA8XMP5fmI for <oauth@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 6 May 2014 15:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lb0-x236.google.com (mail-lb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451A11A03D7 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 6 May 2014 15:40:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lb0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q8so206752lbi.13 for <oauth@ietf.org>; Tue, 06 May 2014 15:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=zmnSTDYAdLFSngVRU0GLmGBVuGuTCy+elYsKxHZR1MY=; b=YVldkYmxCp6pzMFn4g5bztHGwfN9nkj0343e8fbB7OKPguElE+hTZ526PE20OFkufL rNKrpQetAy3M9jNcfZUDayB17nTKSp/qvDse7qnXWmxpYJpgS+I6DSba4kUp1CoOasay b13DLKOJlE31Km+Trmg41wzLR3HT561s5Hwqv+HtpRcOkqz1a2lP4fZC7kVz9szBrnqV bxssWnLHItn5PZlCZin04iiKN75oak/wQ/M+VdvDIwr5RdtvelYWDvuUDMt6NmMF/Vma a0J18u6OONDYmPkAMO9WsZ6iKlqhXenuwCvvqW/NREw8CLWmlezoUTcDm7Ek3rHa2Tpv X/PQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.112.137.5 with SMTP id qe5mr35284185lbb.16.1399416020532; Tue, 06 May 2014 15:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.112.105.134 with HTTP; Tue, 6 May 2014 15:40:20 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CABzCy2BGSuf4hKGVaExAPm2h593AfeoWxTtXpgRx14u9UyOpFw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <53577C73.2010201@gmx.net> <CABzCy2BGSuf4hKGVaExAPm2h593AfeoWxTtXpgRx14u9UyOpFw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 07:40:20 +0900
Message-ID: <CABzCy2CFjWojc41g09SYRzWGm0uPoDwCDN=0Bz3CX8a466x_mg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>
To: Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0115fd3ccceeb704f8c2eefe"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/oauth/eiDg8231yF1qXh3OC7GKuL9d5mQ
Cc: "oauth@ietf.org" <oauth@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-jwt-bearer Shepherd Write-up
X-BeenThere: oauth@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: OAUTH WG <oauth.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/>
List-Post: <mailto:oauth@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/oauth>, <mailto:oauth-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 22:40:27 -0000

I was pinged by Mike that the attached message below apparently did not go
through to the list.
Perhaps it was due to too much "quotation". So, I am forwarding it again,
this time with much less "quotes" from earlier massages in the thread.

The points in this message is:

- I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this specification.
- NRI has PHP and Scala implementation of JWT.

Cheers,

Nat

2014-05-01 19:45 GMT+09:00 Nat Sakimura <sakimura@gmail.com>:

>
>
>
> 2014-04-23 17:40 GMT+09:00 Hannes Tschofenig <hannes.tschofenig@gmx.net>:
>
> Hi all,
>>
>> I am working on the shepherd writeup for the JWT bearer document. The
>> shepherd write-ups for the assertion draft and the SAML bearer document
>> have been completed a while ago already, see
>> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/oauth/current/msg12410.html
>>
>> A few requests:
>>
>> - To the document authors: Please confirm that any and all appropriate
>> IPR disclosures required for full conformance with the provisions of BCP
>> 78 and BCP 79 have already been filed.
>>
>
> I am not aware of any IPR that applies to this specification.
>
>
>> - To all: Are you aware of implementations of this specification? If so,
>> I would like to reference them in my write-up.
>>
>
> NRI has PHP and Scala implementation of JWT.
>
>
>>
>> - To all: Please also go through the text to make sure that I correctly
>> reflect the history and the status of this document.
>>
>> Here is the most recent version of the write-up:
>>
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/hannestschofenig/tschofenig-ids/master/shepherd-writeups/Writeup_OAuth_JWT-Assertion-Profile.txt
>>
>>
>> (The copy-and-paste of the full version is below.)
>>
>> Ciao
>> Hannes
>>
>> PS: Note that I have send a mail about a pending issue to the list. In
>> response to my question I will update the write-up accordingly.
>>
>>
-- 
Nat Sakimura (=nat)
Chairman, OpenID Foundation
http://nat.sakimura.org/
@_nat_en