oauth Discussion Archive - Thread Index
[Prev Page] [Next Page] [Date Index]
[IETF Mailing List Directory]
[oauth List Information]
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Proposal to drop/relocate response_type=code_and_token, (continued)
- [OAUTH-WG] Comments on OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Torsten Lodderstedt
- [OAUTH-WG] Error codes registry,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- [OAUTH-WG] Feedback on normative issues in OAuth2 draft 11 from implementers of draft 10,
Mike Jones
- [OAUTH-WG] Re-Chartering: What Items to work on?,
Hannes Tschofenig
- [OAUTH-WG] BOF about "JSON Cryptographic Syntax and Processing",
Hannes Tschofenig
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Igor Faynberg
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth MAC token type draft,
Igor Faynberg
- [OAUTH-WG] IETF#80: March 27-April 1, 2011,
Hannes Tschofenig
- [OAUTH-WG] expired access token : deserves unique code?,
Paul Walker
- [OAUTH-WG] Feedback on JSON Web Token (JWT) draft -01,
Jeff Lindsay
- [OAUTH-WG] Final cuts and 3 interoperable implementations,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- [OAUTH-WG] JSON Web Token (JWT) draft -01,
Mike Jones
- [OAUTH-WG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-oauth-saml2-bearer-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
- [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
Francisco Corella
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
torsten
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
Francisco Corella
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
torsten
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
Francisco Corella
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
Francisco Corella
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
Nat Sakimura
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
Francisco Corella
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
Francisco Corella
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] TLS is needed for redirecting back to the client,
torsten
- [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Skylar Woodward
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Richer, Justin P.
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Skylar Woodward
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Skylar Woodward
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Skylar Woodward
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Native Client Extension,
Skylar Woodward
- [OAUTH-WG] unregistered applications,
Francisco Corella
- [OAUTH-WG] Opensource REST base Java impl of Oauth2,
Kristoffer Gronowski
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth2.0 client and server in Node.js,
Pierre Ruyssen
- [OAUTH-WG] No client_id parameter in resource requests,
Paul Walker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] No client_id parameter in resource requests,
Paul Lindner
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] No client_id parameter in resource requests,
Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] No client_id parameter in resource requests,
Paul Walker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] No client_id parameter in resource requests,
Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] No client_id parameter in resource requests,
Igor Faynberg
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] No client_id parameter in resource requests,
Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] No client_id parameter in resource requests,
Igor Faynberg
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] No client_id parameter in resource requests,
Phil Hunt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] No client_id parameter in resource requests,
Manger, James H
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 does not require parameter name oauth_token= while passing in authorization header,
Jitesh Bhate
- [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Paul Walker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Jitesh Bhate
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Paul Walker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Aaron Parecki
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Paul Lindner
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Praveen
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Olivier POITREY
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Paul Walker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Paul Walker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
David Waite
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Paul Walker
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] expires_at vs expires_in,
Pelle Wessman
- [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-campbell-oauth-saml-01,
Brian Campbell
- [OAUTH-WG] Comments on core draft -11,
Torsten Lodderstedt
- [OAUTH-WG] Terminology editorial work,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- [OAUTH-WG] Couple questions on draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-01 security considerations,
Brian Campbell
- [OAUTH-WG] Fwd: I-D Action:draft-hardjono-oauth-kerberos-01.txt,
Peter Saint-Andre
- [OAUTH-WG] Signed Fetch,
Justin Richer
- [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer: token characters,
Manger, James H
- [OAUTH-WG] Client Password Credentials,
Marius Scurtescu
- [OAUTH-WG] Bikeshedding poll: 'attributes' parameter vs. attributes parameters,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Andrea Reginato
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Manger, James H
- Message not available
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Marius Scurtescu
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Manger, James H
- [OAUTH-WG] draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer: scheme name,
Manger, James H
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Bearer Token specification draft -01,
Mike Jones
[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-01.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-00.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[OAUTH-WG] Comment on 'application/x-www-form-urlencoded' for URI parameters,
Subbu Allamaraju
[OAUTH-WG] -11,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
[OAUTH-WG] I-D Action:draft-ietf-oauth-v2-11.txt,
Internet-Drafts
[OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 server behavior,
Anton Panasenko
[OAUTH-WG] Requesting mutliple scope, but user authorizes not all,
Martin Ley
[OAUTH-WG] Dropping 'realm' parameter,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
[OAUTH-WG] Feedback on preliminary draft 11 from implementers of draft 10,
Mike Jones
[OAUTH-WG] Call for nominations for the Kantara Initiative 2011 IDDY (IDentity Deployment of the Year) Awards,
Dervla O'Reilly
[OAUTH-WG] Fwd: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5849 (2550),
Peter Saint-Andre
[OAUTH-WG] VOTE: Token type response parameter,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
[OAUTH-WG] section 3.2 error in draft-ietf-oauth-v2-10,
Nick Walker
[OAUTH-WG] OAuth2 WWW-Authenticate scheme,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
Re: [OAUTH-WG] vulnerability in OAuth 2.0/ 1.0/ WRAP leading to DDOS attacks,
pflam
[OAUTH-WG] Definition of resource owner versus end-user,
Alastair Mair
[OAUTH-WG] We are in the Jade 2 room right now.,
Hannes Tschofenig
[OAUTH-WG] Security Considerations Suggestion,
Hannes Tschofenig
[OAUTH-WG] JSON Token spec work at IIW,
Mike Jones
[OAUTH-WG] JSON public key spec results at IIW on Thursday,
Mike Jones
[OAUTH-WG] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-richer-oauth-xml-00],
Justin Richer
[OAUTH-WG] [Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-richer-oauth-instance-00],
Justin Richer
[OAUTH-WG] JSON Token naming spec results at IIW on Wednesday,
Mike Jones
[OAUTH-WG] 2nd OAuth Security Session, Thursday (18:10),
Hannes Tschofenig
[OAUTH-WG] JSON Token encryption spec results at IIW on Wednesday,
Mike Jones
[OAUTH-WG] My slides for the security session,
Hannes Tschofenig
[OAUTH-WG] Meeting Room for Security Session: Jade 2,
Hannes Tschofenig
[OAUTH-WG] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
torsten
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [secdir] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [secdir] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [secdir] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Mark Mcgloin
- [OAUTH-WG] Security Writeups -- Re: [kitten] [secdir] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Security Writeups -- Re: [kitten] [secdir] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [secdir] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Anthony Nadalin
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [secdir] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Richard L. Barnes
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [secdir] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Igor Faynberg
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [kitten] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Nicolas Williams
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [kitten] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Torsten Lodderstedt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] [kitten] ** OAuth Tutorial & OAuth Security Session **,
Anthony Nadalin
[OAUTH-WG] OAuth Extensions,
Richer, Justin P.
[OAUTH-WG] JSON Token spec results at IIW on Tuesday,
Mike Jones
[OAUTH-WG] Another Proposal: OAuth Tutorial, Tuesday, 1810 - 20:00,
Hannes Tschofenig
[OAUTH-WG] Draft Extension: Instance Information,
Justin Richer
[OAUTH-WG] Draft Extension: XML Encoding,
Justin Richer
[OAUTH-WG] Microsoft Deployment of OAuth 2.0 Draft 10,
Mike Jones
Re: [OAUTH-WG] [Openid-specs-ab] Simple Web Discovery,
Anthony Nadalin
[OAUTH-WG] OAuth v2 Authorization Header Credentials,
Mark Lentczner
[OAUTH-WG] OAuth Security Session, Monday, November 8, 1300-1500,
Hannes Tschofenig
[OAUTH-WG] OAuth Tutorial, Monday, November 8, 0900-1130,
Hannes Tschofenig
[OAUTH-WG] Kiva OAuth design decisions,
Skylar Woodward
[OAUTH-WG] Dailymotion API using OAuth 2.0 draft 10,
Olivier POITREY
[OAUTH-WG] Simple Web Discovery,
Mike Jones
[OAUTH-WG] Draf 10 OAuth chapter 2.1 question,
Kristoffer Gronowski
[OAUTH-WG] JSON token draft based upon a convergence proposal,
Mike Jones
[OAUTH-WG] Status ?,
Anthony Nadalin
[OAUTH-WG] OAuth abstractions,
Thomson, Martin
[OAUTH-WG] OAuth 2.0 Perl client,
Keith Grennan
[OAUTH-WG] Token Transfer Protocol,
Niklas Neumann
[OAUTH-WG] Informal Meeting @ IETF#79 (Beijing),
Hannes Tschofenig
[OAUTH-WG] GOOG1,
Manger, James H
[OAUTH-WG] OAuth session at IETF-79,
Torsten Lodderstedt
[OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split,
Blaine Cook
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split,
Mike Jones
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split,
Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split,
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Call for Consensus on Document Split,
Mike Jones
- [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Call for Consensus on Document Split),
Freeman, Tim
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Call for Consensus on Document Split),
William Mills
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Call for Consensus on Document Split),
Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Call for Consensus on Document Split),
Skylar Woodward
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Call for Consensus on Document Split),
George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Call for Consensus on Document Split),
Hannes Tschofenig
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Call for Consensus on Document Split),
Eve Maler
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] So back to use cases? (was RE: Call for Consensus on Document Split),
Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
[OAUTH-WG] Request sent to http: instead of https:`,
Breno
[OAUTH-WG] Opensource impl yet?,
William Mills
[OAUTH-WG] Indirect Access Grant Flow vs. User Agent Profile,
Phil Hunt
[OAUTH-WG] On splitting the spec and the scope of signatures,
Skylar Woodward
[OAUTH-WG] OAuth leeloo V0.1,
Maciej Machulak
[OAUTH-WG] Next steps (draft timeline),
Eran Hammer-Lahav
[OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Manger, James H
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Justin Richer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Stefanie Dronia
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Luke Shepard
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
John Panzer
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Lu, Hui-Lan (Huilan)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Lu, Hui-Lan (Huilan)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Dick Hardt
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Thomas Hardjono
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Lukas Rosenstock
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Pelle Wessman
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Looking for a compromise on signatures and other open issues,
Eran Hammer-Lahav
[OAUTH-WG] Signatures...what are we trying to solve?,
David Recordon
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures...what are we trying to solve?,
George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures...what are we trying to solve?,
Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures...what are we trying to solve?,
George Fletcher
- [OAUTH-WG] Signatures don't solve that problem (was RE: Signatures...what are we trying to solve?),
Freeman, Tim
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures don't solve that problem (was RE: Signatures...what are we trying to solve?),
George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures don't solve that problem (was RE: Signatures...what are we trying to solve?),
Igor Faynberg
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures don't solve that problem (was RE: Signatures...what are we trying to solve?),
Zeltsan, Zachary (Zachary)
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures don't solve that problem (was RE: Signatures...what are we trying to solve?),
Freeman, Tim
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures...what are we trying to solve?,
Prateek Mishra
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures...what are we trying to solve?,
George Fletcher
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures...what are we trying to solve?,
Freeman, Tim
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Signatures...what are we trying to solve?,
William Mills
[OAUTH-WG] Comparing the JSON Token drafts,
Mike Jones
[OAUTH-WG] XML Encoding,
Justin Richer
[OAUTH-WG] Document Management Issue (Signatures),
Tschofenig, Hannes (NSN - FI/Espoo)
Mail converted by MHonArc
