[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ogpx] Notes from my parts of the VWRAP session

From: "Hurliman, John" <john.hurliman at intel.com>
To: Mark Lentczner <markl at lindenlab.com>, ogpx <ogpx at ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 12:45:55 -0600
In-reply-to: <180093C2-AC6E-435B-8AD5-A58B81CCD9FB at lindenlab.com>
References: <180093C2-AC6E-435B-8AD5-A58B81CCD9FB at lindenlab.com>

> 7) I saw clear dislike for including more detailed semantics of
> matching LLSD payloads against LLIDL descriptions. The combination of
> LLIDL's shape semantics, and LLSD's defaulting and conversions was felt
> to be the right level of specification. Nonetheless, if anyone would
> like a more detailed description of how our open source LLIDL system
> performs matching and validation, I can give pointers to the code, or
> provide a write-up to the mailing list if people want. Just ask.
> 

Mark, can you point me at the LLIDL handling code? I'm interested in LLIDL's application to unit testing.

John

References:
- [ogpx] Notes from my parts of the VWRAP session
  - From: Mark Lentczner

Prev by Date: Re: [ogpx] type-system : binary elements in JSON serializations
Previous by thread: Re: [ogpx] Notes from my parts of the VWRAP session
Next by thread: [ogpx] LLSD/LLIDL implementations.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Note Well: Messages sent to this mailing list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.