Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca at avaya.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Wes Hardaker [mailto:wjhns1 at hardakers.net] 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 7:07 PM
> To: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
> Cc: Wes Hardaker; David Harrington; paduffy at cisco.com; opsawg at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
> 
> >>>>> On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 18:01:04 +0200, "Romascanu, Dan 
> (Dan)" <dromasca at avaya.com> said:
> 
> DR> I am not sure that I understand the point that you are making.
> 
> The point I was making was that your statement:
> 
> DR> In the absence of standards PIBs I suspect that the 
> majority or all 
> DR> the deployments use one vendor tools and agents
> 
> I don't think is safe to say.  Unless you're saying there are 
> no standard PIBs anywhere (I don't know, personally).  There 
> aren't any in the IETF because the IETF chose not to publish 
> them and actively discouraged their use.  So if there are 
> standard PIBs, we likely wouldn't know about them.
> --
> Wes Hardaker
> Cobham Analytic Solutions

Hi, 

I hope that I clarified what I meant to say already. Sorry for not being
clear enough. If there are standard PIBs developped out of the IETF
hopefully we shall learn now something about them. 

Dan