Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR

[Kwok Ho Chan <khchan at huawei.com>]

I would like to add that Huawei uses COPS-PR.
-- Kwok --

At 10:43 AM 10/1/2009, Kwok Ho Chan wrote:
> Hi:
> I know of COPS-PR work inside ITU-T (see ITU-T Y.2111).
>
> I believe Juniper may be using COPS-PR in some of their products,
> maybe using private PIBs.
>
> CableLab have their way of using COPS in DOCSIS, which I believe
> uses both push and pull models.  I don't believe they call it COPS-PR,
> but DOCSIS uses some of the COPS-PR features.
>
> Does IETF provide an alternative Policy Management Protocol?
>
> Should IETF be the leader for Policy Management Protocol?
>
> Personally I believe Policy Management is important.
>
> -- Kwok --
>
>
>
> At 09:55 AM 10/1/2009, David Harrington wrote:
>
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I hope that I clarified what I meant to say already. Sorry
> > > for not being
> > > clear enough. If there are standard PIBs developped out of the IETF
> > > hopefully we shall learn now something about them.
> > >
> > > Dan
> > >
> >
> > I personally know of no PIBs developed inside or outside the IETF that
> > are used by multiple vendors.
> >
> > I don't know if the IETF Informational PIBs are used, or just
> > proprietary PIBs.
> > Maybe we can get implementers to contribute some helpful
> > implementation and deployment information.
> > That would help IETF make a more informed decision.
> >
> > dbh
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OPSAWG mailing list
> > OPSAWG at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg