[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR

To: Kwok Ho Chan <khchan at huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
From: Paul Duffy <paduffy at cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:03:40 -0400
Authentication-results: rtp-iport-2.cisco.com; dkim=pass (signature verified [TEST]) header.i=paduffy at cisco.com
Cc: opsawg at ietf.org
Delivered-to: opsawg at core3.amsl.com
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=paduffy at cisco.com; l=251; q=dns/txt; s=rtpiport02001; t=1254416622; x=1255626222; h=from:sender:reply-to:subject:date:message-id:to:cc: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-id: content-description:resent-date:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-to:resent-cc:resent-message-id:in-reply-to: references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:list-owner:list-archive; z=From:=20Paul=20Duffy=20<paduffy at cisco.com>|Reply-To:=20p aduffy at cisco.com|Subject:=20Re:=20[OPSAWG]=20[OPS-AREA] =20Present=20day=20reality=20of=20COPS-PR|Date:=20Thu,=20 01=20Oct=202009=2013:03:40=20-0400|Message-ID:=20<4AC4E0E C.7000503 at cisco.com>|To:=20Kwok=20Ho=20Chan=20<khchan at hua wei.com>|CC:=20David=20Harrington=20<ietfdbh at comcast.net> ,=20opsawg at ietf.org|MIME-Version:=201.0 |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=207bit|In-Reply-To:=20<0KQU00 EWIBKWFR at usaga04-in.huawei.com>|References:=20<4ABCE564.2 0101 at cisco.com>=09<0c0801ca3e2d$e5bf7260$0600a8c0 at china.h uawei.com>=09<EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401A85338 at 30 7622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>=09<sdbpks8m84.fsf at wjh.hardake rs.net>=09<EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401A8547A at 30762 2ANEX5.global.avaya.com>=09<sd8wfw5pkn.fsf at wjh.hardakers. net>=09<EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401A855A7 at 307622AN EX5.global.avaya.com>=09<037b01ca429e$d908d0a0$0600a8c0 at c hina.huawei.com>=20<0KQU00EWIBKWFR at usaga04-in.huawei.com>; bh=sHmFdFC/jWz26flYT1r7T0sE5JDPSFianbygn/jueVs=; b=fUQSc+PsabNuZl0A4Ow9HIp/u21MczG4C4Aqe5Qu2b+/VPdrn5XgniQ8 WN33O2CvaTHuo/fC2SN8aE6QC2oaxt6TdhxwqgcVlo09ERJfowslXlGSJ 6FykPtGnhruGjVdYMCNNyCLFKgjLLxze709eeYD45ktZcvzrt4ljU2uXe I=;
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=251; t=1254416621; x=1255280621; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=paduffy at cisco.com; z=From:=20Paul=20Duffy=20<paduffy at cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[OPSAWG]=20[OPS-AREA]=20Present=20day=2 0reality=20of=20COPS-PR |Sender:=20 |To:=20Kwok=20Ho=20Chan=20<khchan at huawei.com>; bh=sHmFdFC/jWz26flYT1r7T0sE5JDPSFianbygn/jueVs=; b=ZA2QrJs8c19xBnqQPdfjJVcBtjBJrvUGzfi4GeurEEv4qcKpU3FsoQDJSF 8/nb0Oabp25DjGBsTSkGwmbAS3wrlX9tzx8YuEfAuqa98dUG5ftvXnvOpgJb uPtXKfj9o1;
In-reply-to: <0KQU00EWIBKWFR at usaga04-in.huawei.com>
List-archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Cisco Systems
References: <4ABCE564.20101 at cisco.com> <0c0801ca3e2d$e5bf7260$0600a8c0 at china.huawei.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401A85338 at 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <sdbpks8m84.fsf at wjh.hardakers.net> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401A8547A at 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <sd8wfw5pkn.fsf at wjh.hardakers.net> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401A855A7 at 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <037b01ca429e$d908d0a0$0600a8c0 at china.huawei.com> <0KQU00EWIBKWFR at usaga04-in.huawei.com>
Reply-to: paduffy at cisco.com
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)


CableLab have their way of using COPS in DOCSIS, which I believe
uses both push and pull models.  I don't believe they call it COPS-PR,
but DOCSIS uses some of the COPS-PR features.

CableLabs does not use COPS-PR, but they do use COPS.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
  - From: Kwok Ho Chan

References:
- Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
  - From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
  - From: Wes Hardaker
- Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
  - From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
  - From: Wes Hardaker
- Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
  - From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
  - From: David Harrington
- Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
  - From: Kwok Ho Chan

Prev by Date: Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
Next by Date: Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
Previous by thread: Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
Next by thread: Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread