Re: [OPSAWG] [OPS-AREA] Present day reality of COPS-PR

[Andy Bierman <andy at netconfcentral.com>]

Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote:
> One aspect of this discussion is surprising me a little :-) 
> 
> For the record, since I am an AD (March 2006) I have never received a
> request for chartering a new PIB work in the IETF. Neither have I
> received any legacy instructions from my predecessor Bert Wijnen about
> new COPS-PR or PIB being a taboo. I think that I know his position, but
> this is not necessarily the same as mine. If I ever had received such a
> request I would have considered it without prejudice. It's still true
> even now. Probably everybody knows by now that I am not a 'one protocol
> fits all' adept. 
> 

There doesn't seem to be complete consensus to
move this RFC to historic.

I don't really care, but COPS-PR seems to be in use
in places, so we should just go back to ignoring it
in the IETF, and not changing the standards track status at all.


> Dan

Andy