Re: [OPSAWG] Request to adopt draft-azinger-additional-private-ipv4-space-issues as a WG document

[Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org>]

Hi,

There hasn't been much discussion about whether this draft should be
accepted as a WG item. Do people support it being adopted as a WG item? If
so - or if not - I would be grateful if you could publicly state your
support or the reason you object.

Thanks,

Leo

On 24/09/2009 9:30, "Leo Vegoda" <leo.vegoda at icann.org> wrote:

> Dear OPSAREA WG,
>> 
> Leo Vegoda and I wrote this draft in  response to an increasing rate of
> questions about the possibility of creating  new private IPv4 address space.
> We would like to have it adopted as a WG  document.
>> 
> Abstract
> 
>    When a private network or  internetwork grows very large it is
>    sometimes not  possible to address it using private IPv4 address
>    space.   This document describes the problems faced by those  networks,
>    the available options and the issues involved  in assigning a new
>    block of private IPv4 address  space.
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-azinger-additional-private-ipv4-space-issues-
> 01
> 
> Many  thanks,
> 
> Marla Azinger &
> Leo Vegoda
>