Re: [OPSAWG] Request to adopt draft-azinger-additional-private-ipv4-space-issues as a WG document

[Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda at icann.org>]

Hi Ricardo,

On 07/10/2009 11:02, "Ricardo Patara" <patara at lacnic.net> wrote:

[...]

> Then, it has separate chapter:
> 5.  Options and Consequences for Defining New Private Use Space
> 
> Giving the idea to the reader that this is the best way to solve the
> problem.
> Am I right on reading it this way? Was it the idea of the authors?

No, we did not intend to present the options described in section 5 as
preferred outcomes. We just wanted to describe the pros and cons for each of
those options. Was there specific language that implied we supported these
options, or was it something else that gave you that impression?

Many thanks,

Leo