|
Hi Roque
The OPSAWG
description of work includes items that do not necessarily fall into any
particular group and/or include documents of a BCP that will provide guidance
for authors and reference for reviewers. In addition Int Area is not a WG and its documents are
only AD sponsored submissions.
We believe that this document covers an unwritten BCP that should
be maintained and the details surrounding that BCP. In the recent past
such a document has been requested due to an increase in interest of the subject
matter however no such document exists. We wish to fill in this
gap.
Thank
you
Marla
Azinger
Leo,
The issue of NAT44 and additional private or "inter ISP" address
space has been discussed in several IETF meeting at the INT AREA WG. Why would
this issue be hosted in the OPS area instead of the INT area?
Regards,
Roque.
On Sep 24, 2009, at 1:30 PM, Leo Vegoda wrote:
Dear OPSAREA
WG,
Leo Vegoda and I wrote
this draft in response to an increasing rate of questions about the
possibility of creating new private IPv4 address space. We would like
to have it adopted as a WG document.
Abstract
When a private
network or internetwork grows very large it
is
sometimes not possible to address it using
private IPv4 address
space. This document
describes the problems faced by those
networks,
the available options and the issues
involved in assigning a new
block of private IPv4
address space.
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-azinger-additional-private-ipv4-space-issues-01
Many
thanks,
Marla Azinger &
Leo
Vegoda
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG
mailing list
OPSAWG at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
-------------------------------------------------------------
Roque Gagliano
LACNIC
GPG Fingerprint: E929 06F4 D8CD 2AD8 9365 DB72 9E4F 964A 01E9
6CEE
|