Re: [OPSAWG] powerconsumption mib

[<Minoru.Teraoka at jp.yokogawa.com>]

Hi,

Thanks for your comment.
I am reading the I-D
'draft-quittek-power-monitoring-requirements-00.txt' now.
If this scheme can acquire the power consumption and traffic of each module,
it might meet my requirement.  Does this contain the item that becomes
the change factor of the amount of power consumption?
The engine performance is decided by quantity of traffic after all.

Regards,
Minoru Teraoka 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan) [mailto:dromasca at avaya.com] 
> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 5:49 PM
> To: Teraoka, Minoru (Minoru.Teraoka at jp.yokogawa.com); 
> j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de
> Cc: opsawg at ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [OPSAWG] powerconsumption mib
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Inventing new objects and creating a new MIB module for 
> information that is already described another standard MIB 
> modules does not simplify in any way the implementation in 
> the router, and does not reduce the traffic - on the 
> contrary. It is quite reasonable to assume that routers 
> already implement basic ifTable objects for traffic counters. 
> The Entity MIB and Entity Sensor MIB allow for power 
> consumption to be read from a device with a small number of objects. 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Dan
> (speaking as a contributor)
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: opsawg-bounces at ietf.org
> > [mailto:opsawg-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of 
> > Minoru.Teraoka at jp.yokogawa.com
> > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 10:41 AM
> > To: j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de
> > Cc: opsawg at ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] powerconsumption mib
> > 
> > Hi,
> > Thank you for your reply.
> > 
> > To each functions of the router, there is a demand to obtain power 
> > consumption information.  I had wanted to achieve simple 
> MIB intended 
> > for the router, it became this composition.  The point of 
> this MIB is 
> > an information gathering for a plain unit of the router.
> > To prevent a traffic increase, I wanted to avoid the information 
> > gathering in each detailed entity.
> > 
> > Minoru Teraoka
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Juergen Schoenwaelder
> > > [mailto:j.schoenwaelder at jacobs-university.de]
> > > Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 4:24 PM
> > > To: Teraoka, Minoru (Minoru.Teraoka at jp.yokogawa.com)
> > > Cc: opsawg at ietf.org
> > > Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] powerconsumption mib
> > > 
> > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 06:12:14AM +0100, 
> > > Minoru.Teraoka at jp.yokogawa.com wrote:
> > > 
> > > > I have submitted an I-D as follows.
> > > > 
> > > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-teraoka-powerconsumption-mib-00.txt
> > > > 
> > > > The goal of this MIB is the realization of effective
> > reducing power
> > > > consumption for the router.  Currently, the router is able
> > > to manage
> > > > dynamic performance.  This MIB is used to monitor the
> > > router traffic
> > > > and power consumption to optimize performance.
> > > 
> > > From a quick look, it seems the MIB module duplicates 
> parts of the 
> > > IF-MIB, the ENTITY-MIB and the ENTITY-SENSOR-MIB. I do not
> > see why it
> > > is needed; and if there is something not covered by existing MIB 
> > > modules, it should be built on top of the exiting MIB
> > infrastructure.
> > > 
> > > /js
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > Juergen Schoenwaelder           Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> > > Phone: +49 421 200 3587         Campus Ring 1, 28759 
> Bremen, Germany
> > > Fax:   +49 421 200 3103         <http://www.jacobs-university.de/>
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > OPSAWG mailing list
> > OPSAWG at ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> > 
>