Re: [OPSAWG] powerconsumption mib

[<Minoru.Teraoka at jp.yokogawa.com>]

Dear Juergen,

Thank you for your reply.

I thought that your approach about the power monitoring is appropriate.
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-quittek-power-monitoring-requirements-00.txt
I also have some requirements such as related to the traffic for
power monitoring.  If possible, I would like to cooperate with you.

Best regards,

Minoru

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Quittek [mailto:Quittek at nw.neclab.eu] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 6:28 AM
> To: Teraoka, Minoru (Minoru.Teraoka at jp.yokogawa.com); Dan 
> Romascanu; Juergen Schoenwaelder
> Cc: opsawg at ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] powerconsumption mib
> 
> Dear Minoru,
> 
> Thank you for contributing to the effort of developing power 
> monitoring standards. There are already several existing MIB 
> modules. Besides the one you describe in your draft there is 
> a prototype implementation
> (http://www.csee.usf.edu/~christen/energy/lcn08_2_proceedings.pdf)
> and least two proprietary industrial MIB modules.
> 
> Instead of contributing all of them as individual Internet 
> drafts and then trying to merge them, we started collecting 
> requirements from all existing approaches first and collected 
> them in draft-quittek-power-monitoring-requirements. I would 
> appreciate to receive your comments, suggestions and contributions.
> 
> After agreeing on a set of requirements, we can jointly look 
> at what is already available, such as the entity MIB module, 
> and what would still be needed to meet the requirements.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>     Juergen  
>