Re: [OPSAWG] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC5676 (1928)

["Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca at avaya.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Juergen Schoenwaelder 

> 
> I am trying to understand the errata and so I might stupid 
> questions. Since you report two independent defects, it might 
> have been useful to have two errata posted. I have no clue 
> whether the errata tracker allows to make such changes now.
>  

It's always better to enter errata at a granularity where a single
resolution makes sense. I think that the submitter can edit to reduce
the text to one item, and then submit a second item. Or alternatively I
can reject the current erratum (#1928) and Alfred can submit two (or
more) errata instead. 

Dan