Re: [OPSAWG] WG last call for "Mechanisms for Optimal LAG/ECMP Component Link Utilization in Networks"

Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu> Tue, 10 September 2013 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <ghanwani@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C388321F9A1C for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:30:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.977
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.977 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TiRt08xb7gU2 for <opsawg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EBF21F9A16 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:30:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id w62so5826414wes.1 for <opsawg@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5c5Iail7moxirxdpYUw42KwemskEBw+vzYoSZIFEBsA=; b=wkIuzzr2EWdLe48w3KJVxyu62HBZvN9L9+fyouVHvUeB1gC2LBYpSPyvxrnShUWNr/ LZTv/0NNMhal+Nius5gxpFVt5CMpbwUKmXqCW9rAr5Cp4A5SnrjHI/8r9K5c1sORofRt nRdNb/34G2FnV2TYI3UteYuwBv+pSevQnmGurVDnqciBYo5BOB6zAfKOuPXnMiSC6Xbk 2FUyxzIZeB4TqyE4CXCk93TsVQgMaUwW2ByvTE/BGddJ7X9MFq9JcMmVBzz64bfJz6hY Hq+tWzgrXgne6OEajDB/SfaZ9fsTHTAkSfg8bypFdROije0pp2xn+a2cq94vkll1o1tX PyHg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.123.227 with SMTP id md3mr17814597wjb.17.1378827041363; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: ghanwani@gmail.com
Received: by 10.217.54.6 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:30:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128CE68A@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
References: <52191268.5070500@gmail.com> <9904FB1B0159DA42B0B887B7FA8119CA128CE68A@AZ-FFEXMB04.global.avaya.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 08:30:41 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: q1HsvwdB3x8XckF-xDhSHXkKNJM
Message-ID: <CA+-tSzxzrGgbEH1cULg+CBVEhR1mQw90u7PSe9meDNAwdWrN1Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Anoop Ghanwani <anoop@alumni.duke.edu>
To: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01229a5801df5704e609303d"
Cc: "opsawg@ietf.org" <opsawg@ietf.org>, "opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] WG last call for "Mechanisms for Optimal LAG/ECMP Component Link Utilization in Networks"
X-BeenThere: opsawg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: OPSA Working Group Mail List <opsawg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsawg>
List-Post: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>, <mailto:opsawg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 15:30:43 -0000

Hi Dan,

Thanks for the careful review.  Please see inline.

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 3:13 AM, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) <dromasca@avaya.com>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I apologize for the one day delay in sending this review. Vacation
> interfered.
>
> I read the document and I have a basic unclarity. Hopefully it is just me,
> and maybe some clarification text and references to be added.
>
> What does this document exactly refer to when saying 'LAG/ECMP
> techniques'? Is this either LAG (layer 2) or ECMP, or a combination of the
> two, or all of these? There is no reference at all in the document for LAG,
> no solid reference for ECMP (2992 only refers to 'an ECMP algorithm').
>

It refers to all of them, i.e. LAG, ECMP, and even the (hierarchical)
combination.  We can try and provide some clarification around that.  We
will add 802.1AX as a reference for LAG.  What would be a reasonable
reference for ECMP?  Would RFC 2991 suffice?


>
> I also had a hard time finding the sFlow references. In desperation I went
> to wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SFlow which kindly informed me that
>
> > sFlow is a technology for monitoring network,[1] wireless[2] and host[3]
> devices. The sFlow.org consortium[4] is the authoritative source for the
> sFlow protocol specifications.[5] sFlow version 5 is the current version of
> sFlow. Previous versions of sFlow, including RFC 3176, have been
> deprecated.[6]
>
> This seems problematic. RFC 3176 has no mark of being 'deprecated' in IETF
> terms anyway.
>

The reference that we have for sflow in the references section is the
"sflow Version 5" specification which is located at
http://sflow.org/sflow_version_5.txt.  We can update the reference to
include the URL.

Anoop


>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: opsawg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:opsawg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> > Of Melinda Shore
> > Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 11:07 PM
> > To: opsawg@ietf.org
> > Cc: opsawg-chairs@tools.ietf.org
> > Subject: [OPSAWG] WG last call for "Mechanisms for Optimal LAG/ECMP
> > Component Link Utilization in Networks"
> >
> > This is to announce the start of working group last call on:
> >
> >     Mechanisms for Optimal LAG/ECMP Component Link Utilization in
> >         Networks
> >
> > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-large-flow-load-
> > balancing/
> >
> > It is intended for publication as an informational RFC.
> >
> > Please give it a careful read and provide any feedback to this mailing
> > list by September 9, 2013
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > opsawg chairs
> > _______________________________________________
> > OPSAWG mailing list
> > OPSAWG@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> OPSAWG@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
>