Re: [OPSEC] Request for opions on acceptingdraft-gont-opsec-ip-security-01 as a working group document

["Smith, Donald" <Donald.Smith at qwest.com>]

This too has a lot of potential value.
I think we need to finalize the format etc... as most of the comments so far have been around the format (not the actual content).


Donald.Smith at qwest.com<mailto:Donald.Smith at qwest.com>
Please cc the handlers to keep them all in the loop.
________________________________
From: opsec-bounces at ietf.org [opsec-bounces at ietf.org] On Behalf Of Joel Jaeggli [joelja at bogus.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 01, 2009 11:35 AM
To: opsec wg mailing list
Subject: [OPSEC] Request for opions on acceptingdraft-gont-opsec-ip-security-01 as a working group document

I trust everyone had a eventful new year and I hope that for the sake of
our industry the next six months doesn't look worse than the previous
six months.

Working from the the action items it's time to test consensus on accepting;

draft-gont-opsec-ip-security-01

http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ip-security-01

as a working group document.

Commentary will be accepted through Friday January 9th.

Thanks
Joel
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec