Re: [OPSEC] draft-ietf-opsec-blackhole-urpf-03

[Joel Jaeggli <joelja at bogus.com>]

Christopher Morrow wrote:
> I'd also say push this to LC in the WG... Joe/Joel?

agree

> -Chris
> 
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Alfred HÎnes <ah at tr-sys.de> wrote:
>> Authors,
>> thanks for faithfully taking care of my change suggestions,
>> leading to  draft-ietf-opsec-blackhole-urpf-03 .
>>
>> Quickly following up to this version, I only got stuck at a minor
>> formatting flaw in Section 4.2, where the table in step 7.2 is
>> poorly formatted.  (This could be deferred to the RFC Editor.)
>>
>> Otherwise, I have no more 'complaints'.   :-)
>>
>> I now recommend going ahead with this draft for RFC publication.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>>  Alfred HÎnes.
>>
>> --
>>
>> +------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
>> | TR-Sys Alfred Hoenes   |  Alfred Hoenes   Dipl.-Math., Dipl.-Phys.  |
>> | Gerlinger Strasse 12   |  Phone: (+49)7156/9635-0, Fax: -18         |
>> | D-71254  Ditzingen     |  E-Mail:  ah at TR-Sys.de                     |
>> +------------------------+--------------------------------------------+
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSEC mailing list
>> OPSEC at ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> OPSEC at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>