[Trimming the CC list to the relevant WGs.] Hi, On 2009-4-21, at 15:03, Fernando Gont wrote:
P.S.: Is there any specific proposal/advice to pursue this effort? There's has been some talk about tcpm vs opsec, but so far it is not clear to me how to proceed here.
if the IETF decides to work on this, I believe TCPM would be the most appropriate group, given that that's where the TCP expertise is. I'm fully OK with doing this in cooperation with OPSEC, maybe via a joint WG last call or other means, if they desire this.
One question: If the IETF decides to publish a document in this space, and if you decide to offer draft-gont-tcp-security as a starting point for this work, are the UK CNPI and you as the author OK with the IETF WG obtaining change control? The WG consensus process would likely lead to changes compared to the current version, probably even significant changes.
Lars
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature