[OPSEC] IETF OPSEC WG Deliverables -
"Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com> Mon, 05 March 2012 11:42 UTC
Return-Path: <gvandeve@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: opsec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC2821F872F for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 03:42:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.508
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.508 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.090, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Dmoqu-H1IFIC for <opsec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 03:42:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-2.cisco.com (ams-iport-2.cisco.com [144.254.224.141]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6640F21F8723 for <opsec@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 03:42:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=gvandeve@cisco.com; l=8696; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1330947774; x=1332157374; h=mime-version:subject:date:message-id:from:to:cc; bh=/XIYng+TcpokM47IF+o+jt/NkTfU6r2v1Hhsssq/65o=; b=dHGc2DYA10kRITf94zwuCp4rTD2AkAhmgxgK9dhEmjf4W6Y5I/MqI7oD UTPJ4hbvx4g2TpqupDwJtsYIDRLWgvsvPsNX58A07v7CDY6QictHGXw28 AGb2oGs7ktV36+AOx1h0Agm+JQNyiHIXVdVPyuy+obvCtBIYHP73Msp+L g=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.73,533,1325462400"; d="scan'208,217"; a="67675551"
Received: from ams-core-2.cisco.com ([144.254.72.75]) by ams-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2012 11:42:52 +0000
Received: from xbh-ams-201.cisco.com (xbh-ams-201.cisco.com [144.254.75.7]) by ams-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id q25BgqL4002896; Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:42:52 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-102.cisco.com ([144.254.74.77]) by xbh-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 12:42:52 +0100
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
x-cr-hashedpuzzle: CDDm CQ30 GzoY G2iW M8mu QqAi T7Gr T+34 V/um YQhh YU3Y ZVuK eeP3 eo8H fOIk f2yR; 3; bwBwAHMAZQBjAEAAaQBlAHQAZgAuAG8AcgBnADsAcgBvAG4AQABiAG8AbgBpAGMAYQAuAG8AcgBnADsAdwBhAHIAcgBlAG4AQABrAHUAbQBhAHIAaQAuAG4AZQB0AA==; Sosha1_v1; 7; {368B8A20-F5A5-4286-AD5E-3E9F3477F9A7}; ZwB2AGEAbgBkAGUAdgBlAEAAYwBpAHMAYwBvAC4AYwBvAG0A; Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:42:46 GMT; SQBFAFQARgAgAE8AUABTAEUAQwAgAFcARwAgAEQAZQBsAGkAdgBlAHIAYQBiAGwAZQBzACAALQA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CCFAC5.191357EC"
x-cr-puzzleid: {368B8A20-F5A5-4286-AD5E-3E9F3477F9A7}
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 12:42:46 +0100
Message-ID: <5C99EC8C99D9BB45AC51D20DC2AD2DC50705C450@XMB-AMS-102.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: IETF OPSEC WG Deliverables -
Thread-Index: Acz6xRVqyic5K2OgTwKv5MdiUeWznQ==
From: "Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)" <gvandeve@cisco.com>
To: opsec@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2012 11:42:52.0735 (UTC) FILETIME=[19542CF0:01CCFAC5]
Cc: warren@kumari.net, Ron Bonica <ron@bonica.org>
Subject: [OPSEC] IETF OPSEC WG Deliverables -
X-BeenThere: opsec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: opsec wg mailing list <opsec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/opsec>
List-Post: <mailto:opsec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec>, <mailto:opsec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 11:42:59 -0000
Dear all, In an effort to re-energize the OPSEC WG, we have decided to drop any WG item which has not been progressed or updated last 2 years, and at the same time they will also be dropped from the OPSEC WG charter. Thus, if your draft is NOT updated by the deadline of 12 March 2012 according the deadline mentioned at https://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2012.html#IETF83 <https://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2012.html#IETF83> then it will be removed from the OPSEC charter. It is a hard decision to take, however to keep the WG fresh and the deliverables relevant for this current time, we believe we have to take this action. During IETF83 we will revise the charter with input from the WG. In any case, please find here info if you have questions about OPSEC and its charter: http://tools.ietf.org/wg/opsec/ <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/opsec/> https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsec/charter/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsec/charter/> Warren & Gunter
- [OPSEC] IETF OPSEC WG Deliverables - Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
- Re: [OPSEC] IETF OPSEC WG Deliverables - Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] IETF OPSEC WG Deliverables - Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)