RE: stub area in a vrf I agree. However, I'd say that even if the PE router is not connected tomultiple areas it should behave as if it one and originate the default. It can usethe OSPF route type in advertised with the BGP extended community to determinewhich routes to advertise into the stub area.----- Original Message -----From: Robert PineauSent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 9:35 AMSubject: Re: stub area in a vrf
Hi John, Mani,
What if the VRF was an ABR, and simply supplied a default route to the CE in the stub?
I think this should work and allow the PE-CE link be part of a stub area.
Thanks,
Rob.-----Original Message-----
From: Mani Devarajan [mailto:mani_devarajan at NET.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 8:56 PM
To: OSPF at PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: stub area in a vrf
Hi Jonh,
I tried to do similar kind of testing, that is configuring PE-CE link as stub. But as PE will be ASBR, we cannot configure it in a stub.rfc 2328: Section 3.6
AS boundary routers cannot be placed internal to stub areas.Thanks,
ManiAcee Lindem wrote:
>Hi John,
>
>Note that this draft (draft-ietf-l3vpn-ospf-2547-01.txt) is a product
>of the L3VPN WG and not the OSPF WG. Perhaps Eric or Padma could
>respond. Although I know how I would handle it I don't think the stub
>area case is covered in the draft.
>
>Thanks,
>Acee
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "John Pecola" <john_pecola at YAHOO.COM>
>To: <OSPF at PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
>Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 7:52 PM
>Subject: stub area in a vrf
>
>
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>With the 2547 VPNs, a CE router may receive type 3
>>LSAs from a PE for redistributed routes. Assuming that
>>2547 BGP routes are redistributd into ospf on the PE
>>in the vrf (ASBR), can there be a scenario where it is desired to
>>configure the PE-CE link as part of a stub area? Should it be even
>>allowed?
>>
>>Thanks
>>John
>>
>>
>>
>>__________________________________
>>Do you Yahoo!?
>>Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
>>http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
>>
>>