[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Working Group Last Call on "Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF" (draft-ietf-ospf-mt-03.txt) - Corrected

To: OSPF at PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call on "Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF" (draft-ietf-ospf-mt-03.txt) - Corrected
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak at CISCO.COM>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 14:48:02 -0700
References: <200504051735.j35HZre49565@merlot.juniper.net>
Reply-to: Mailing List <OSPF at PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF at PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7

Yakov,

Yakov Rekhter wrote:

Folks,

This is the start of a Working Group last call for
"Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF" (draft-ietf-ospf-mt-03.txt).
All comments should be sent to this list by 12 AM (EDT), 04/19/2005.

How is computing different paths for different classes of service
mention in the draft differs from ToS routing ?

one difference compared to ToS routing as specified in 1583 is the ability to include/exclude each link/prefix in/from each topology.

Peter


Yakov.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Working Group Last Call on "Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF" (draft-ietf-ospf-mt-03.txt) - Corrected
  - From: Acee Lindem

References:
- Re: Working Group Last Call on "Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF" (draft-ietf-ospf-mt-03.txt) - Corrected
  - From: Yakov Rekhter

Prev by Date: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-iana-00
Next by Date: Re: Working Group Last Call on "Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF" (draft-ietf-ospf-mt-03.txt) - Corrected
Previous by thread: Re: Working Group Last Call on "Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF" (draft-ietf-ospf-mt-03.txt) - Corrected
Next by thread: Re: Working Group Last Call on "Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF" (draft-ietf-ospf-mt-03.txt) - Corrected
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread