Re: Working Group Last Call on "Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF" (draft-ietf-ospf-mt-03.txt) - Corrected

[Yakov Rekhter <yakov at JUNIPER.NET>]

Naiming,

> < cut ...>
> > As for requirements, the example most often given is when a SP wants to 
> > provide separate topologies for unicast and multicast services.
> > 
> 
> I was told at least one ISP used MT isis to link remote IPv6 POPs
> through GRE tunnels, IPv4 topology was not enabled on those tunnels.

That is fine. But what that has to do with computing different paths for 
different classes of service ?

Yakov.

> 
> thanks.
> - Naiming
> 
> > Note that there is a similar proposal in the ISIS WG so I'd venture to 
> > say that there
> > is some agreement on the requirement - 
> > draft-ietf-isis-wg-multi-topology-09.txt.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Acee