[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Equal-cost path

To: OSPF at PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Subject: Re: Equal-cost path
From: Kireeti Kompella <kireeti at JUNIPER.NET>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 15:40:29 -0700
In-reply-to: <OF126B0677.37EA48FE-ONC2256FDF.003D24CD@ecitele.com>
References: <OF126B0677.37EA48FE-ONC2256FDF.003D24CD@ecitele.com>
Reply-to: Mailing List <OSPF at PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF at PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>

On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Ilan Bercovich wrote:

> When not using "equal-cost multipath",
> Which equal-cost path should be selected?

The one that's more equal than the rest.

Kireeti.
-------

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Equal-cost path
  - From: Yasuhiro Ohara

References:
- Equal-cost path
  - From: Ilan Bercovich

Prev by Date: Re: Working Group Last Call on "Multi-Topology (MT) Routing in OSPF" (draft-ietf-ospf-mt-03.txt) - Corrected
Next by Date: Re: Equal-cost path
Previous by thread: Equal-cost path
Next by thread: Re: Equal-cost path
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread