Re: [OSPF] 2 BCP or not 2 BCP

["Vishwas Manral" <vishwas.ietf at gmail.com>]

Hi Thomas,

Can you explain the details of what the discussion was about? Not
everyone was present at the Vancouver meeting.

Thanks,
Vishwas

On Jan 29, 2008 11:34 AM, Thomas, Matthew R <mrthom at essex.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
>
>
> In Vancouver there was a vote for production of a more up to date OSPF BCP
> containing general guidance to reduce unnecessary LSA2 generation, and to
> re-scale perceptions of the protocol performance and capabilities.
>
>
>
> Are there any thoughts?
>
>
>
> *Dave W. can I move forward with this? There seemed an overwhelming vote
> that something more modern could be done and that this looks like a good
> idea. *Abhay would you like to co-author this if we go ahead?
>
>
>
> Matthew R Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf