RE: [OSPF] 2 BCP or not 2 BCP

["Thomas, Matthew R" <mrthom at essex.ac.uk>]

Hi Vishwas,

The audio is still available I think. The discussion was concerning an
up to date guidance doc for rolling out networks / choice of areas or
not/ link types etc, to give Industry some guidelines. This would also
incorporate the general themes behind ospf-lite (removal of redundant
LSAs) but without protocol changes. Standard Best Current Practise doc.

Matthew R Thomas


-----Original Message-----
From: Vishwas Manral [mailto:vishwas.ietf at gmail.com] 
Sent: 29 January 2008 19:43
To: Thomas, Matthew R
Cc: ospf at ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OSPF] 2 BCP or not 2 BCP

Hi Thomas,

Can you explain the details of what the discussion was about? Not
everyone was present at the Vancouver meeting.

Thanks,
Vishwas

On Jan 29, 2008 11:34 AM, Thomas, Matthew R <mrthom at essex.ac.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Hi WG,
>
>
>
> In Vancouver there was a vote for production of a more up to date OSPF
BCP
> containing general guidance to reduce unnecessary LSA2 generation, and
to
> re-scale perceptions of the protocol performance and capabilities.
>
>
>
> Are there any thoughts?
>
>
>
> *Dave W. can I move forward with this? There seemed an overwhelming
vote
> that something more modern could be done and that this looks like a
good
> idea. *Abhay would you like to co-author this if we go ahead?
>
>
>
> Matthew R Thomas
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF at ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF at ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf