Re: [OSPF] draft-venkata-ospf-dynamic-hostname-02.txt

[Acee Lindem <acee at redback.com>]

Hi Anton,
You have some excellent comments. I'll defer them to the draft authors.

We will be asking to make this straight-forward draft a WG document  
at IETF 71.

Thanks,
Acee
On Feb 29, 2008, at 7:21 AM, Anton Smirnov wrote:

>     Hi all,
>     have a comment on this draft (OK, it's not WG document yet but  
> hope
> that's not a problem).
>     The document doesn't stipulate that Dynamic Hostname TLV can be
> present at most once. Also, if implementation chooses to announce both
> AS and area scope RI LSA then it is not clear if it is allowed to
> announce different names.
>
>     I personally would prefer 1:1 mapping between ID and router's name
> to be required but some people might disagree with me. Either way
> document should specify if multiple names are allowed or not.
>
>     If we are to send text string then document should specify what
> exactly is understood by 'text'. Is it ASCII or UTF-8 encoding? Are
> symbols like 0x1 or 0xAF allowed?
>
>     Thanks,
>
> Anton
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf