Re: [OSPF] IETF 71 OSPF WG Minutes

[Acee Lindem <acee at redback.com>]

I'll add to the minutes that you stated you would like to see other  
solutions entertained.
Thanks,
Acee
On Apr 4, 2008, at 12:22 PM, PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri wrote:

>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Acee Lindem [mailto:acee at redback.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:33 PM
>> To: PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri
>> Cc: OSPF List
>> Subject: Re: [OSPF] IETF 71 OSPF WG Minutes
>>
>>
>> On Mar 21, 2008, at 2:35 PM, PAPADIMITRIOU Dimitri wrote:
>>
>>> acee,
>>>
>>>>   Question regarding PW3 document (Andrew's draft)
>>>>   Acee - not a big fan
>>>>   Dave Ward - have the authors give another presentation
>>>>   Dimitri Papadimitriou - What is holdup?
>>>
>>> add: comments raised were addressed (e.g. possibility to segment
>>> between
>>> instances when solution will be made available by OSPF WG
>> see Section
>>> 5.3).
>>
>> Added.
>>
>>>
>>>>   Acee - Number of people didn't like it, but we are deferring to
>>>>   PW3 group. Now it seems that PW3 is supporting it so can bring
>>>>   it back to OSPF WG for consideration.
>>>
>>> side note: i would like to keep the discussion at the technical
>>> level if
>>> any remaining - ping-pong between working groups do not help solving
>>> them.
>>
>> Added.
>>
>>>
>>>>   Multi-instance / Transport Instance Draft - Acee (See Slides)
>>>>
>>>>   Will be pushing harder for this, discuss on list
>>>
>>> add (if my record is correct, you stated also that): the
>> working group
>>> will open the floor for alternative solutions once the problem
>>> statement
>>> will be refined further than a brief overview introduction (as it
>>> is the
>>> case in this v00 of the document).
>>
>> We won't stop anything from being proposed. Didn't I ask the that
>> technical discussions be addressed in separate mail threads?
>
> the only record i saw in the minutes is the one mentioned here above.
> reason why i asked to complement it as i think that discussion  
> needs to
> happen (and urgently before pushing the docs themselves as you also
> stated)
>
> thanks,
> -dimitri.
>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>>
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> -d.
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: ospf-bounces at ietf.org [mailto:ospf-bounces at ietf.org] On
>>>> Behalf Of Acee Lindem
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 5:23 PM
>>>> To: OSPF List
>>>> Subject: [OSPF] IETF 71 OSPF WG Minutes
>>>>
>>>> Please unicast corrections to me.  If you want to discuss a
>>>> specific topic, please start a thread on this list with the
>>>> specific topic as the subject (this will make searching the
>>>> archives easier).
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/08mar/minutes/ospf.txt
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Acee
>>>>
>>
>>

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf