[OSPF] Questions regarding draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-00.txt

[Richard Ogier <ogier at earthlink.net>]

Abhay,

I have two questions regarding draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-00.txt.

First, the Intended Status is given as "Standards Track".  Is this a
mistake?  I thought all three OSPF-MANET drafts were supposed to be
Experimental.

Second, I noticed that the concept of "Unsynchronized Adjacencies",
along with the "Unsynchronized SPT" and the "Unsynchronized" bit (U-bit)
are not included in the draft, even though they were included in
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roy-ospf-smart-peering-01

I thought this concept was needed in order to distinguish between
synchronized links and unsynchronized links in Router-LSAs, to avoid
a circular dependency problem.
Is this also a mistake, or is there a reason for this omission?

Richard
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf