Re: [OSPF] Questions regarding draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-00.txt

[Abhay Roy <akr at cisco.com>]

Hi Richard,

Thanks for the review. Please see inline for comments.


On 6/14/2008 7:55 AM, Richard Ogier wrote:
> Abhay,
> 
> I have two questions regarding draft-ietf-ospf-manet-or-00.txt.
> 
> First, the Intended Status is given as "Standards Track".  Is this a
> mistake?  I thought all three OSPF-MANET drafts were supposed to be
> Experimental.

I will change this to Experimental.

> Second, I noticed that the concept of "Unsynchronized Adjacencies",
> along with the "Unsynchronized SPT" and the "Unsynchronized" bit (U-bit)
> are not included in the draft, even though they were included in
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-roy-ospf-smart-peering-01
> 
> I thought this concept was needed in order to distinguish between
> synchronized links and unsynchronized links in Router-LSAs, to avoid
> a circular dependency problem.
> Is this also a mistake, or is there a reason for this omission?

You are right. The draft is currently synced to smart-peering-00 
version. When I get it ready for LC, I plan to update it to -01 version.

Regards,
-Abhay

> Richard
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF at ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf