Re: [p2pi] Thoughts on how IETF standards can help P2P/ISPs
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [p2pi] Thoughts on how IETF standards can help P2P/ISPs
Joe Touch wrote:
> FWIW, there is a lot of work in peer selection in web cache hierarchies
> that may be applicable here. Keith Moore's work (SONAR) comes to mind,
> but there are others.
>
> Come to think of it, there are a lot of analogies between P2P - and P4P
> - and web cache hierarchies. Has this been explored??
Not to toot our horn here, but our position paper [1] provided
what we think is a good literature review on application layer
topology estimation -- from synthetic coordinate systems like
Vivaldi, PIC, and GNP to the more recent work on Ono, which uses
Akamai CDN servers to fine tune peer selection.
By and large, the conclusions we arrived at following the
literature review were summarized aptly by Enrico in an earlier
email:
I think the IETF should focus on the first part of the
problem, the front-end of a generic third-party peer selection
service p2p applications can query in order to make better
choices; innovation and competition will then happen on the
back-end of such a service without requiring standardization
in the first place.
[1] Enrico Marocco, Vijay K. Gurbani, Volker Hilt, Ivica Rimac,
Marco Tomsu - Peer-to-Peer Infrastructure: A Survey of Research on
the Application-Layer Traffic Optimization Problem and the Need for
Layer Cooperation
Thanks,
- vijay
--
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
Email: vkg at {alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW: http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi
Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.