Re: [p2pi] Follow-Up from Comcast Presentation
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [p2pi] Follow-Up from Comcast Presentation



RFC3662?

On 2008-6-7, at 20:09, ext Joel M. Halpern wrote:
> Several of the meeting presentations referred to "Scavenger service".
>
> As a definition, assuming I am allowed to define using diffserv, how  
> about:
>
> Unmarked packets, and packets marked for better diffserv classes will
> receive preferential queueing treatment compared with those marked  
> with
> Scavenger class service.  To avoid starvatation, the Scavanger queue
> will be guaranteed a minimal percentage (10%?) of the data capacity  
> even
> when normal and better services could consume all available bandwidth.
>
> That is basically the inverse of the simplified EF definition, for
> achieving essentially the opposite goal.

_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi



Note: Messages sent to this list are the opinions of the senders and do not imply endorsement by the IETF.