Re: [p2pi] Charter and problem statement

["Stas Khirman" <stas at khirman.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stanislav Shalunov [mailto:shalunov at shlang.com]
>  From the client perspective, it will not tell the ISP anything it
> doesn't already know, except in encrypted mode, where it'll naturally
> be disabled.
>
[Stas Khirman] 
I respectfully disagree - without DPI, ISPs have no knowledge about specific
content exchanged. With DPI, they have such knowledge, but can claim a
"safe-harbor" as they are not facilitating exchange (and probably restricted
to intervene due "net neutrality"). 
 
> This list has plenty of client application developers and ISPs.  There
> is no need to hypothesize what they might or might not consider a show-
> stopper or a problem at all.
[Stas Khirman] 
It is exactly a main reason for my postings - I want to clarify this issue
in a large community of potential ALTO customers (mostly ISPs). I may be
right or wrong in my opinion, but believe in clarifying major requirements
before spending major efforts in design.

_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi