Re: [p2pi] Charter and problem statement

[Reinaldo Penno <rpenno at juniper.net>]

This thread made the think that we need more security wording on the
charter. 

I see ALTO maybe requiring a security document considerations of its own
besides the security section on each document.

There is clearly an expectation of privacy from the P2P client. There is
clearly an expectation from the ISP that he is not aiding (conscientiously)
illegal file sharing, amongst others.

Thanks,

Reinaldo


On 7/22/08 10:04 AM, "Enrico Marocco" <enrico.marocco at telecomitalia.it>
wrote:

> Nicholas Weaver wrote:
>> However, can ALTO be used as an oracle to find the peers distributing
>> illegitimate content, once an illegitimate content identifier has been
>> discovered by the legitimate content owner?
>> 
>> Should this be considered a requirement in any direction (MUST
>> enable?  MUST prohibit?)
> 
> I think this is a reasonable question. Plagiarizing the requirements
> draft, my answer would be that it MUST allow users not to disclose the
> content being exchange.

_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi at ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi